ACCORDING TO THE POLLS –

The Democrats are barely treading water. I am not really surprised.

I used to be a Democrat, and I still have a number of good friends who are Democrats. I would trust them anywhere. Except in public office.

Stranger

Posted in PolyTicks | Leave a comment

THE RESTORE HONOR RALLY

Moonbattery has a fairly extensive series of closeups from Glenn Beck’s Restore Honor Rally. Click here and scroll down for the graphic details.

Here is an great interview with Alveda King, Martin Luther King’s niece, who spoke at the Rally:

According to a couple of people who were there at the end, the mall was absolutely clean when the crowd left. There was not so much as a gum wrapper on the ground. Since Trud West, the Washington Post, estimates crowd size by the litter tonnage, you can expect an “Oh, yeah, two or three thousand turned out for Beck” from the media.

And since crowds for leftist events are notorious for leaving litter, from Woodstock to the Obama inauguration, the “progressive” rags think they have a reason. Here’s the mall after the 2009 Inauguration:

Look at these people, wading through the trash they left at the inauguration, and all unaware.

“Satis putant vitio carere; etiam virtutibus carent.” So saith Quintillian.

“Ain’t it the Troof, ain’t it the troof.” Snagglepuss

Stranger

Posted in STRAYS | Leave a comment

IT’S NOT THE TAXES, IT’S THE “OVERHEAD”

I see a great deal of opposition to a Fair Tax, and almost as much to a Value Added Tax. Since I am all too aware of the drawbacks to a “Value Added Tax,” let me talk about the various system of systematic extortion governments implement to feed themselves.

First, what’s wrong with the present system? Too many people see the current system as unfair, since a great many people pay no direct taxes at all. In fact, many get a subsidy from the government out of the pockets of those whose labor was taken to provide it. To add insult to injury, much too large a percentage of tax receipts wind up funding bureaucrats. Who are like the proverbial lilies of the field, neither toiling nor spinning, just collecting fat salaries for doing as little as possible. And impeding those who do toil, spin, and pay taxes.

So of course, there is a clamor for a “new system” to so everyone will have “skin in the game,” so to speak. So lets discuss alternate tax schemes, starting with a concrete example to keep life simple.

Right now, a dairy farmer is taxed on its profits, the creamery on its profits, the retailer on its profits, and a small percentage of the cost of a gallon of 2 percent goes to the state. Altogether, income taxes on producers and middlemen account for about 3% of the cost of milk. (Of course, as a nod to my economist friends – this does not account for the taxes on expensed items such as payroll taxes on the cashier, the taxes on the fuel to bring milk to market. All together, direct and indirect taxes account for about 20% of the cost of a gallon of milk.) And a quick survey of grocery chain ads around the United States shows milk is selling for around $3.50 a gallon.

Keeping in mind that dairies sell milk by the pound of butterfat – but I am trying to keep things simple –

To start with, let’s say the Congress, in its miniscule wisdom, decides to impose a 15% “Value Added Tax,” a VAT, on top of all other taxes. That tax starts with the first person to charge for a product, and “compounds” every time a product is sold..
So the dairy farmer guesses his cost of production at $1.47 a gallon, and must pay a 15% tax. Which brings the price the farm must get to $1.6905 a gallon. Which the creamery/processor may or may not pay.

If the creamery buys raw milk at 1.6905 a gallon, with ordinary markup for processing costs it will sell that gallon at $2.586465 plus 15% VAT. Or 2.9774 a gallon. Which the retailer will have no choice but to pay.

And with a normal markup to provide that 2% profit, the retailer must sell for $3.96 a gallon. Plus VAT. For a total of $4.55 a gallon. For milk that under the present system sells for $3.50 a gallon. So with compounding a 15% VAT on top of the present tax system would add about 29% to the price of milk. And more than that to the cost of almost everything else. Because very few common items pass through only three hands before it reaches the market: and because most common items have raw materials costs to pay VAT on.

So how about that “Fair Tax.” The Fair Tax is a sort of VAT – on retail sales. It would repeal all the myriad federal taxes we pay, from income taxes to the levees, assessments, and whatever other sort of legalized extortion at gunpoint Congress has burdened us with. There would be no tax at the raw material level, nor any tax at any level short of the checkout stand. So what happens?

When it is all said and done, a typical American worker works for more than four months to pay their Federal taxes, and almost eight months to pay their all their direct taxes. Most of that would be done away with. Remember that labor is wealth, and wealth is money. So virtually two thirds of our yearly labor is taken up by direct taxation. But of course, there are the indirect taxes that are included in the price of things we buy.

The cashiers payroll taxes, and the taxes and imposts on the truck that delivered the milk and its fuel. Altogether – a typical American worker labors for eleven months to pay their direct and indirect taxes. Only about 8% of our earnings go to pay for goods and services; the rest goes for taxes on goods and services. If all our taxes were eliminated, that $30,000 car would probably retail for about $2,400. Can you imagine what would happen to our exports if we could deliver a Ford Focus to the dock for $2100?

A fair tax would sweep all those direct and indirect Federal taxes away. Instead of income taxes and luxury taxes and fuel taxes and tax taxes, there would be one single tax on retail sales. To be sure, a 15% Federal Fair Tax. A tax on every new item and every food product you buy. But you would NOT pay most of the gross 92% tax rate on both new and used merchandise you pay now.

So what would happen? MASS CONFUSION – until everything settled down. And then that $3.50 gallon of milk would sell for about 63 cents. Including the Fair Tax, but not including state and local taxes.

“But everyone would pay taxes, wail the progressives!” Your darn tootin’ everyone would pay taxes. That is why it is called a fair tax. But they would also pay much less for goods and services. Meaning that the tax burden on the poor would be enough less that they could actually buy something again.

Of course, the number one purchaser of goods and services is Good Old Uncle Sucker, er, Sam. The second largest purchaser are the 50 states, followed by city and county governments. Their costs for most things would come down by the same percentage as everyone else. So the cost of government would drop substantially. So the US Gummitup would cost everyone a whole lot less money. And the cost of state and local governments would also drop – drastically. Instead of 92% gross tax on everything – there would be a gross 25% tax on retail sales.

Now, I have tried to lay out the basics of a somewhat complex subject in a relatively painless fashion. For more, let me give the podium to Karl Denninger, who addresses the basics of the Fair Tax from a different perspective.

A national survival perspective. And Denninger makes sense to the working economists I talk to. So he’s worth the read.

Stranger

Posted in MONEY | Leave a comment

A LESSON IN DEMOCRACY

Democracy has changed enormously in the last 2,500 years. Here’s a lesson in democracy,

Aristotle called democracy “rule by the poor, because there are so many of them.” When politicians are elected, as most 21st Century politicians are, “rule by the poor” becomes “rule for the poor.” Because the poor have the most votes, and the poor are most likely to sell their vote in the expectation that politicians promises have some value.

Stranger

Posted in PolyTicks | Leave a comment

DEMOS KICK CANDIDATE OUT OF RESTAURANT – AND MEETING

South Carolina’s Democrats kicked Alvin Greene, their candidate for Senator, out of a meeting. Greene responded with a charge of “racism.”

I can pretty well agree with that.

Stranger

Posted in POLITICAL NASTIES | Leave a comment

OBAMA SAYS THE NATIONAL DEBT WILL BE $1.36 Tn THIS YEAR

Obama speaks with forked tongue.

First, the fiscal 2010 deficit is not $1.36 trillion. You must add the “obligation deficit” to the “spending deficit” and when you do that you come up with more than $4.0 trillion dollars. For just one fiscal years deficit.

So how much is a trillion dollars? A lot. Copy and paste this into your browser, and scroll down:

http://www.dailycognition.com/index.php/2009/03/25/what-1-trillion-dollars-looks-like-in-dollar-bills.html

The title is misleading – the graphic shows a trillion dollars in $100 bills. Closely packed and stacked seven feet high, they cover 1.78 football fields. So the Obama Deficit for 2010 would cover more than 7 football fields, seven feet deep.

Obamas total deficit so far? Closely packed and stacked 7 feet high, Obama’s debt would cover 18 football fields, with enough room in one corner for a picnic table.

And your children and mine are expected to pay Obama’s debt.

Oh, It’s not fair to say all the debt is Obama’s? He owns well over half, after just 19 months in office. It’s his.

Stranger

Posted in ECONOMICS | Comments Off

AS “DIGGER O’DELL” WOULD SAY

“Now, I wouldn’t say that, O’Reilley.” Still, the man has a valid point:

Especially the photo of San Fran Nan with an idea. Struggling to get out. If it comes out, she had better wrap it up in pink paper and put it in a lock box. It will probably be the only one she ever has on her own.

But no, I really would not say that. Not in just that way. This is more to the point:

Stranger

Posted in Pols | Comments Off

THE CHICAGO WAY, BLAGO 1 FOR 24

Former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich was convicted on a relatively minor charge of lying to the feds, and the jury hung on the other 23 counts. The Federal Prosecutors say they will retry Blago and his brother on all the remaining charges.

Uh huh. Seems like I have seen this movie before. When it comes to the Windy City, politicians wear teflon grease.

Stranger

Posted in Pols | Comments Off

MEDIA MATTERS SAYS “NO DEATH PANELS”

The George Soros funded “progressive” web site Media Matters claims there are no ObamaCare death panels.

Well, the current flap is about the anti-prostate-cancer drug Provenge. As a man of “advanced age” that concerns me. My urologist tells me that I will get prostate cancer if I live long enough, and Provenge is his “go to drug” when that happens. But since it is expensive, Obama’s Dr. Berwick does not want it used. Instead, he wants the FDA to withdraw approval.

Upcoming is the flap about the anti-breast cancer drug, Avastin. It is expensive – it does not instantly cure every patient – and the government does not want to pay for it. So Berwick is mulling getting the FDA to cancel its approval. A friend of the wife’s has been treated with Avastin, and she just beginning the five year waiting period before she can be said to be “cancer free.”

While death from cancer is often an agonizing death, Berwick wants the FDA to pull approvals on drugs that could extend the lives or cure millions. Condemning those millions to an early death at best, an agonizing death at worst.

There is another drug that is expensive, but works. It works so well that even the British NHS death panel, the NICE board, approves it for wet macular degeneration. That drug is Lucentis. A chemical cousin of Avastin, the current cost is $2,000 an injection, and patients need from six to twenty four injections. And it does prevent blindness. It works – and I can see. But Lucentis is also in Berwick’s sights. He would have cancer patients go home and die – and macular degeneration sufferers go home and go blind.

No “death panels?” Just exactly what do you think Berwick’s mission is, Media Matters? Berwick’s mission is to shuffle Seniors and the chronically ill off this mortal coil just as quickly as humanly possible. And that is a death panel, any way you chop the language.

Stranger

Posted in COMMENTARY | Comments Off

THAT’S FUNNY, THAT IS

A new Republican campaign ad that stick remarkably close to the truth:

Stranger

Posted in PolyTicks | Comments Off